Arc Flash Hazard Analysis Is Required
NFPA 70E 130.3(B)(1) requires that an electrical hazard analysis be performed to ensure that workers are properly protected whenever they are exposed to electrical hazards from work on or near equipment that is not in an "electrically safe condition" (see NFPA 70E Article 120 for guidance on putting equipment in an electrically safe condition). This includes work required to deenergize the equipment.
Part of an electrical hazard analysis is an arc flash hazard analysis. According to NFPA 70E Section 130.3, the goal of arc flash hazard analysis is to identify:
Selection of PPE can be by an Analytical Incident Energy Analysis or by using the Hazard/Risk Categories in the tables of Article 130.7. Performing an analytical arc flash hazard analysis provides you an additional benefit: an in-depth look at your plant's electrical system. Such an analysis gives you data you can use to improve overall system performance, reduce downtime and manage costs.Show less
The Nine Steps of Arc Flash Hazard Analysis
Section 4 of IEEE 1584-2002, Guide for Arc Flash Hazard Calculations, states that the results of the arc flash hazard analysis are used to "identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system."
Section 4 also suggests a nine-step approach to arc flash hazard analysis. Be sure to read the cautions and disclaimers carefully.
For information about calculating short circuit currents and performing an overcurrent protective device coordination study, the guide refers to the IEEE Red Book and IEEE Buff Book.
Step 1: Collect System and Installation Data
The data needed for an arc flash hazard analysis is similar to that needed for a short circuit and coordination study. It's essential to model the system in detail to get a reasonable assessment of the arc flash hazard. For many facilities, this will mean collecting all the data needed to build an up-to-date one-line diagram.
For facilities with a recent short circuit study, it may mean:
Extending the existing study to include control equipment.
Refining a study that omits impedances to determine worst-case short circuit currents. Worst-case arc flash energies may be achieved when lower fault currents result in considerably longer clearing times for the overcurrent protective device.
Suggested data collection forms are included in the IEEE guide, as are other useful tips on collecting data from your system and your utility.
Step 2: Determine System Modes of Operation
The IEEE 1584 guide gives examples of different modes of operation, including operation with more than one utility feed, tie breakers opened or closed, and generators running. This information is important in determining the different short circuit currents that might be available to each location for the different modes. As noted in Step 1, the highest available fault current may not yield the worst-case arc flash energy, since the worst-case energy also depends on the characteristics of the overcurrent protection devices.
Step 3: Determine Bolted Fault Currents
Calculate the bolted fault currents from the data gathered in Step 1 and Step 2. The typical method is to enter the data into a commercially available software program that allows you to model your system and easily switch between modes of operation. Additional guidance on the calculation is given in the guide.
Step 4: Determine Arc Fault Currents
The bolted fault current calculated for each point in the system represents the highest fault current expected to flow to any short circuit. In the case of an arcing fault, the current flow to the fault will be less, due to the added impedance of the arc. It's important to adequately predict these lower levels, especially if the overcurrent protective devices are significantly slower at these reduced levels—such situations have been known to provide worst-case arc fault hazards.
Step 5: Find Protective Device Characteristics and Duration of Arcs
IEEE 1584 offers guidance on using the time-current curves of overcurrent protective devices in various scenarios—how to handle average-melt-time-only curves, for example, and relay-operated circuit breakers. For special cases, including certain types of current limiting fuses, time-current curves are not required, because their characteristics have been incorporated into the final flash-protection boundary and incident energy equations.
Step 6: Document System Voltages and Classes of Equipment
Factors such as bus gap and voltage affect arc energies and are required for IEEE 1584 equations. A table is provided with typical bus gaps for various equipment up to 15kV.
Step 7: Select Working Distances
Typically, this is assumed to be the distance between the potential arc source and the worker's body and face. Incident energy on a worker's hands and arms would likely be higher in the event of an arcing fault because of their closer proximity to the arc source. Typical working distances for various types of equipment are suggested in a table.
Step 8: Determine Incident Energy for All Equipment
The analyst will need to choose equations based upon voltage level and the overcurrent protective device and equipment.
In addition to the current-limiting fuse equations, the IEEE guide provides two generic equations that call for the data described above. There are also generic circuit breaker equations, similar to the fuse equations, to use when time-current curves are not available. These calculations provide heat energy densities in either cal/cm² or joules/cm², values useful in selecting appropriate PPE and fire retardant clothing.
Because of the complexity and number of manual calculations possible, software is recommended to complete this step. Most software gives you a choice of equations, with selection depending on such factors as type of equipment, voltage levels and protective devices.
A spreadsheet-type calculator is included with IEEE 1584 and can be useful for simple calculations and small systems.
Step 9: Determine Flash-Protection Boundary for All Equipment
Instead of solving for cal/cm² at a given working distance, this equation solves for a distance at which the incident heat energy density would be 1.2 cal/cm² (or 5.0 joules/cm²). Software is also recommended for this calculation, for the same reasons mentioned in Step 8.Show less
Using the Analytical Method to Select PPE
Appendix D of NFPA 70E and IEEE Standard 1584, Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard Calculations, identifies a systematic, nine-step approach for performing a comprehensive arc flash hazard analysis.
The process begins with a short circuit study to determine the available "bolted" fault current at each location in the system. Arcing fault currents are less than the maximum bolted fault current and need to be estimated. All relevant overcurrent protection device data must also be obtained to accurately predict the duration (clearing time) of the arc fault current. Other factors that affect arc flash energies need to be weighed as well.
A choice of formulas for calculating arc flash protection boundaries and incident energy can be found in NFPA 70E and IEEE 1584. If a worker is required to be within the arc flash boundary, then PPE must be selected for the expected incident energy calculated.
Note that IEEE 1584 contains separate equations for calculating the dramatic reduction in arc flash energies possible with certain current-limiting fuses. Using these fuses can also reduce the category of PPE workers are required to wear.
Using the Table Method to Select PPE
NFPA 70E also offers a table method for selecting protective clothing and other PPE. But you must be sure that the parameters of your electrical system are covered by these tables, as indicated in the various footnotes of Tables 130.7(C)(15)(a), 130.7(C)(15)(b), and 130.7(C)(16).
For a discussion comparing PPE selection using the table method versus the analytical method, see "A Summary of Arc Flash Energy Calculations" by D.R. Doan and R.A. Sweigart, found in the July/August 2003 issue of IEEE Transaction on Industry Applications, or contact Mersen Technical Services.Show less
Risk Assessment Procedure. The electrical safety program shall include a risk assessment procedure and shall comply with 110.1(H)(1) through 110.1(H)(3).
Elimination, substitution and engineering controls are the most effective methods to reduce risk as they are usually applied at the source of possible injury or damage to health and they are less likely to be affected by human error. Awareness, administrative controls, and PPE are the least effective methods to reduce risk as they are not applied at the source and they are more likely to be affected by human error.Show less